Akhilesh Yadav Held a Conference: SP Claims 151 Ambedkar Statues Vandalised Across 72 UP Districts

Akhilesh Yadav Held a Conference and Released SP’s Ambedkar Statue Report

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference at the Samajwadi Party headquarters in Lucknow on September 20, where he raised the issue of alleged vandalism of statues of Dr. Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar across Uttar Pradesh. According to figures presented by the Samajwadi Party, 151 Ambedkar statues were damaged or vandalised across 72 districts during the period of BJP rule in the state. The figures were described by Yadav as part of a party-prepared report based on district-level information.

The issue has become part of a broader political discussion in Uttar Pradesh concerning Ambedkar, the Constitution, Dalit representation and law-and-order issues. Akhilesh Yadav held a conference after a meeting of the SP state committee and used the occasion to present details of the report and question the police response in the reported cases.

It is important to note that the 151 figure is a claim presented by the Samajwadi Party, rather than an independently verified statewide government database. Reports from multiple news organisations have attributed the figures to the SP’s survey and documents.

Ballia Reportedly Recorded the Highest Number of Cases

During Akhilesh Yadav held a conference, the SP president said that Ballia had recorded the highest number of reported incidents involving Ambedkar statues. The party’s district-wise figures put Ballia at nine cases, followed by Azamgarh with six. Mathura, Muzaffarnagar and Saharanpur were reported to have five cases each. Ghazipur, Gautam Buddh Nagar, Prayagraj, Lucknow and Varanasi were listed with four cases each.

These figures were presented as part of the party’s internal assessment. The SP subsequently shared a district-wise breakdown through its social-media channels, citing media reports and information collected during its survey.

The geographic spread mentioned in the report indicates that the issue was not limited to one particular region of Uttar Pradesh. The cases cited by the party cover districts in eastern, western and central parts of the state.

Police Action Becomes a Major Part of the Debate

Another important point raised when Akhilesh Yadav held a conference was the alleged level of police action in the reported incidents. Yadav said that arrests had been made in only 14 of the 151 cases. He further stated that FIRs against unidentified persons had been registered in 45 cases, while eight cases involved named accused. According to the figures he presented, no action had been reported in 84 cases.

The numbers have therefore shifted attention from the alleged vandalism itself to the question of how individual incidents were investigated. The SP has argued that the police response should be examined case by case, particularly where the party says no action was taken.

At the same time, these figures should be understood as claims made during a political press conference. The available reports do not establish that every case in the SP compilation has been independently verified through a common official dataset.

SP Links the Issue With Ambedkar and Constitutional Politics

When Akhilesh Yadav held a conference, he connected the reported incidents with a wider political argument concerning Dr. B.R. Ambedkar and the Constitution. He alleged that the vandalism was deliberate and linked it to what he described as the BJP’s position on constitutional change. The BJP had not issued a response to these particular allegations in the reports available at the time.

Ambedkar’s statues are significant public symbols in many communities, particularly among Dalit groups. As a result, damage to such statues can become a sensitive social and political issue. Any investigation into vandalism therefore involves not only the question of property damage but also the need to establish the identity and motive of those responsible.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference at a time when Uttar Pradesh politics is already increasingly focused on the 2027 Assembly election. Political parties are seeking to highlight issues related to social justice, representation, employment, reservation and law and order.

What the SP Report Says About the 151 Cases

The information presented after Akhilesh Yadav held a conference included additional details about the timing of the reported incidents. According to the SP’s year-wise breakdown, four cases were listed in 2022, 12 in 2023, 13 in 2024, 29 in 2025 and 47 in 2026. The party also said 46 statues were damaged during the first tenure of the Yogi Adityanath government and 105 during its second tenure.

These figures form part of the SP’s political audit and should therefore be distinguished from independently compiled government statistics. The party says its workers conducted surveys across 72 districts and collected information about incidents involving Ambedkar statues.

The distinction is important because political parties frequently conduct their own surveys to highlight governance issues. Such reports can raise questions for public authorities, while individual claims still require verification through official records, FIRs, police investigations and court proceedings.

Ambedkar Issue Gains Political Importance in Uttar Pradesh

The subject discussed after Akhilesh Yadav held a conference has significance beyond the individual incidents. Dr. B.R. Ambedkar is closely associated with the drafting of the Indian Constitution and remains an important figure in debates surrounding equality, social justice, reservation and representation.

For the Samajwadi Party, the issue also fits into its broader PDA political framework involving backward classes, Dalits and minorities. Yadav has repeatedly raised questions concerning the representation and welfare of these groups. Recent reporting shows that the SP leadership is placing these subjects prominently in its political messaging ahead of the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly election.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference not only to discuss the reported statue vandalism but also to raise wider questions about reservation and representation. His remarks therefore formed part of a larger political narrative being developed by the Samajwadi Party.

Need for Verification and Investigation

Following Akhilesh Yadav held a conference, the central factual questions surrounding the report are likely to concern the individual cases: when each incident occurred, what damage was reported, whether an FIR was registered, whether arrests were made and what happened during subsequent investigations.

If 151 incidents were recorded by the SP, official police records could provide additional information about the status of each case. Such verification would help distinguish between cases where investigations are ongoing, cases where accused persons have been identified, cases that resulted in arrests and cases where authorities found insufficient evidence.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference where he presented the issue as evidence of inadequate action, while the available reporting makes clear that the 151-case figure originated from the SP’s own documentation. Further official clarification would therefore be relevant for establishing the complete picture.

Political Debate Ahead of the 2027 Election

The controversy comes as Uttar Pradesh prepares for its next Assembly election. Akhilesh Yadav held a conference at a politically significant moment, with the SP seeking to consolidate its support among different social groups.

The reported Ambedkar statue cases are likely to remain part of discussions about Dalit concerns, social harmony and law enforcement. However, the political claims surrounding the issue need to be separated from the underlying factual questions. The identity of those responsible for individual incidents can ultimately be established through police investigations and judicial proceedings rather than political statements alone.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference in which he called attention to the 151 cases and questioned the level of police action. The BJP’s response to the allegations and any official government data could provide additional context.

Conclusion

The controversy following Akhilesh Yadav held a conference centres on the Samajwadi Party’s claim that 151 statues of Dr. B.R. Ambedkar were damaged or vandalised across 72 Uttar Pradesh districts. Ballia was identified by the party as the district with the highest number of reported cases, while the SP also highlighted figures relating to FIRs, arrests and cases where it says no action was taken.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference to present the party’s findings and connect the issue with broader questions concerning Ambedkar, the Constitution, reservation and social justice. The allegations have political significance, particularly with the 2027 Uttar Pradesh Assembly election approaching.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference based on information compiled by the SP, so the report should be read as the party’s documented claim unless and until corresponding official records independently confirm the complete dataset. The next important developments will be any government response, police clarification and the status of investigations into the individual incidents.

Akhilesh Yadav held a conference that has consequently brought the issue of alleged Ambedkar statue vandalism back into the centre of Uttar Pradesh’s political discussion. The underlying cases, however, will require evidence-based investigation and case-by-case verification to establish responsibility and the precise level of police action.